GDXW vs. IAUM
GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) are both Gold funds. GDXW is actively managed, while IAUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IAUM.
Performance
GDXW vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than IAUM's 3.00% return.
GDXW
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUM
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXW vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | -4.89% | 21.25% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 3.00% | 7.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXW and IAUM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXW vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank
GDXW
IAUM
GDXW vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXW | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.16 | -0.70 |
Drawdowns
GDXW vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and IAUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXW | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -20.87% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.99% | -17.68% | -15.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -5.30% | -8.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.70% | — |
Volatility
GDXW vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXW | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.39% | 26.31% | +35.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 17.86% | +43.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 17.86% | +43.53% |
GDXW vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXW vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison
GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, while IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 39.39% | 7.48% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXW and IAUM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.
GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.09% for IAUM.
Find the right allocation for GDXW and IAUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer