GDXW vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both Gold funds. GDXW is actively managed, while GLDM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

GDXW vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 3.00% return.

GDXW

• 1D: -4.02%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: -4.89%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLDM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 3.00%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 31.49%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	-4.89%	21.25%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	3.00%	7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and GLDM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

GDXW vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 32
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDXW	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.02	-0.56

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXW	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.83%	-21.63%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.14%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.14%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.99%	-17.65%	-15.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.45%	-6.22%	-7.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.69%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDXW	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.39%	26.39%	+35.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.39%	17.91%	+43.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.39%	16.85%	+44.54%

GDXW vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXW vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	39.39%	7.48%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXW and GLDM in my portfolio?

GDXW and GLDM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDXW or GLDM?

On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXW or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXW or GLDM?

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between GDXW and GLDM?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.10% for GLDM.