GDXW vs. DIG
GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DIG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). GDXW is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
GDXW vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -23.48% return, which is significantly lower than DIG's 57.02% return.
GDXW
- 1D
- -4.16%
- 1M
- -21.57%
- 6M
- -33.84%
- YTD
- -23.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- 6M
- 39.50%
- YTD
- 57.02%
- 1Y
- 68.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 33.20%
- 10Y*
- 3.82%
GDXW vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | -23.48% | 25.26% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 57.02% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXW and DIG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXW vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
GDXW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIG
GDXW vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXW | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXW vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -46.10%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXW | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.10% | -97.04% | +50.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.10% | -54.00% | +7.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.74% | -64.31% | +46.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.46% | — |
Volatility
GDXW vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXW | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.38% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.94% | 41.89% | +20.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.94% | 51.35% | +10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.94% | 57.79% | +4.15% |
GDXW vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXW vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.46%, more than DIG's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.58% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 59.46% | 7.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXW and DIG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.
GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 59.46%, compared with 1.58% for DIG.
GDXW is categorized as Gold, while DIG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.95% for DIG.
Find the right allocation for GDXW and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer