PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXW vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 74.30% return.


GDXW

1D
-4.02%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
2.36%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHAT

1D
-0.66%
1M
27.78%
YTD
74.30%
6M
73.13%
1Y
144.01%
3Y*
55.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and CHAT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXW

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDXW vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXWCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.98

-1.53

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXWCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-31.34%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.99%

-0.66%

-32.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.45%

-5.35%

-8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

Volatility

GDXW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXWCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.39%

30.74%

+30.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.39%

29.90%

+31.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.39%

29.90%

+31.49%

GDXW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, more than CHAT's 1.64% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GDXW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 1.64% for CHAT.

GDXW is categorized as Gold, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.75% for CHAT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXW and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer