GDXW vs. CHAT
GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.
Performance
GDXW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 74.30% return.
GDXW
- 1D
- -4.02%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 27.78%
- YTD
- 74.30%
- 6M
- 73.13%
- 1Y
- 144.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | -4.89% | 21.25% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 74.30% | -8.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXW and CHAT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
GDXW
CHAT
GDXW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.98 | -1.53 |
Drawdowns
GDXW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -31.34% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.99% | -0.66% | -32.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -5.35% | -8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.51% | — |
Volatility
GDXW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXW | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.39% | 30.74% | +30.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 29.90% | +31.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.39% | 29.90% | +31.49% |
GDXW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, more than CHAT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.64% | 2.85% |
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF | 39.39% | 7.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.
GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 1.64% for CHAT.
GDXW is categorized as Gold, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.75% for CHAT.
Find the right allocation for GDXW and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer