PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXU vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXU vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -57.47% return, which is significantly lower than DXJ's 17.86% return.


GDXU

1D
-0.54%
1M
-49.20%
YTD
-57.47%
6M
-46.20%
1Y
38.54%
3Y*
35.00%
5Y*
-14.72%
10Y*

DXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
2.00%
YTD
17.86%
6M
21.01%
1Y
51.36%
3Y*
31.77%
5Y*
25.93%
10Y*
18.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-57.47%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.66%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
17.86%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and DXJ is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020

0.18

The correlation between GDXU and DXJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDXU vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDXU
DXJ

Basic Materials

100.0%
8.5%

Communication Services

-

2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

15.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

1.7%

Financial Services

-

18.3%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Industrials

-

27.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

12.9%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Basic Materials

GDXU
100.0%
DXJ
8.5%

Communication Services

GDXU

-

DXJ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GDXU

-

DXJ
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

GDXU

-

DXJ
4.7%

Energy

GDXU

-

DXJ
1.7%

Financial Services

GDXU

-

DXJ
18.3%

Healthcare

GDXU

-

DXJ
6.8%

Industrials

GDXU

-

DXJ
27.4%

Real Estate

GDXU

-

DXJ

-

Technology

GDXU

-

DXJ
12.9%

Utilities

GDXU

-

DXJ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXU vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXUDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.53

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

4.70

-4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

18.34

-17.30

GDXU vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXUDXJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

2.94

-2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

1.37

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.42

-0.55

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.39%

-49.63%

-44.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.26%

-10.98%

-69.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.26%

-22.19%

-58.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.93%

-22.19%

-70.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.26%

-2.06%

-78.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.78%

-14.33%

-55.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.20%

2.81%

+34.39%

Volatility

GDXU vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 50.50% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.19%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

50.50%

4.19%

+46.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

122.03%

13.33%

+108.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

140.25%

17.58%

+122.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

111.49%

19.00%

+92.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

110.52%

20.19%

+90.33%

GDXU vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXU vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.10%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXU and DXJ have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (50.50%) compared to DXJ (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 5-year performance, DXJ leads with 25.93% vs -14.72% for GDXU. On fees, DXJ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 25.93% return vs -14.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DXJ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for GDXU.

DXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

GDXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while DXJ is Japan Equities. GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXU and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXU and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer