GDXJ vs. VDE
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 11.53%/yr vs 9.47%/yr for VDE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
GDXJ vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -10.70% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 31.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 11.53%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.47% annualized return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -19.25%
- YTD
- -10.70%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 42.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
VDE
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 31.33%
- 6M
- 29.93%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 20.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
GDXJ vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -10.70% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 31.33% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and VDE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2009 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GDXJ and VDE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDXJ vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDXJ
VDE
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDXJ
VDE
Communication Services
GDXJ
-
VDE
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDXJ
-
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
GDXJ
-
VDE
-
Energy
GDXJ
-
VDE
Financial Services
GDXJ
-
VDE
-
Healthcare
GDXJ
-
VDE
-
Industrials
GDXJ
-
VDE
Real Estate
GDXJ
-
VDE
-
Technology
GDXJ
-
VDE
-
Utilities
GDXJ
-
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
VDE
GDXJ vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXJ | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 3.80 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 10.98 | -7.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXJ | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.21 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.77 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.32 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.28 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than VDE's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -74.20% | -14.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.60% | -11.80% | -23.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.60% | -21.41% | -14.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.99% | -26.58% | -24.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | -69.29% | +11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.94% | -7.08% | -27.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.48% | -19.96% | -40.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.67% | 4.08% | +9.59% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 17.66% compared to Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) at 6.96%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.66% | 6.96% | +10.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.71% | 16.37% | +26.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.84% | 20.36% | +30.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.34% | 26.42% | +14.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.15% | 29.93% | +14.22% |
GDXJ vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than VDE's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.39% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and VDE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to VDE (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, GDXJ leads with 11.53% vs 9.47% for VDE. On fees, VDE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDE has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 11.53% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.39% for VDE.
GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while VDE is Energy Equities. GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.09% for VDE.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer