GDXJ vs. SBS
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while SBS (Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 12.00%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for SBS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDXJ vs. SBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than SBS's 15.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has underperformed SBS with an annualized return of 12.00%, while SBS has yielded a comparatively higher 16.43% annualized return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -19.14%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 51.06%
- 3Y*
- 44.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
SBS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -6.98%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 38.40%
- 3Y*
- 40.12%
- 5Y*
- 32.68%
- 10Y*
- 16.43%
GDXJ vs. SBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -8.37% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP | 15.28% | 80.60% | -4.21% | 46.89% | 48.42% | -13.79% | -40.98% | 91.22% | -20.37% | 23.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and SBS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009 | 0.24 |
The correlation between GDXJ and SBS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (10 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. SBS — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
SBS
GDXJ vs. SBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXJ | SBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.55 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 4.65 | -1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. SBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than SBS's maximum drawdown of -76.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and SBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | SBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -76.49% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.47% | -24.88% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.47% | -24.88% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.76% | -30.35% | -19.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | -61.91% | +4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.25% | -22.90% | -10.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.45% | -25.70% | -34.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.41% | 8.28% | +6.13% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. SBS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP (SBS) at 8.92%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | SBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.46% | 8.92% | +10.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.41% | 24.61% | +18.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.54% | 33.86% | +17.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.50% | 36.90% | +4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 43.51% | +0.72% |
Dividends
GDXJ vs. SBS - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than SBS's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
SBS Companhia de Saneamento Básico do Estado de São Paulo - SABESP | 2.33% | 4.68% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 1.88% | 0.97% | 2.93% | 1.99% | 3.86% | 2.76% | 0.65% | 1.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and SBS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to SBS (8.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs SBS's -76.49%.
SBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and SBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer