PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXJ vs. REAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXJ vs. REAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and The RealReal, Inc. (REAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly higher than REAL's -34.85% return.


GDXJ

1D
3.15%
1M
-19.14%
YTD
-8.37%
6M
-6.68%
1Y
51.06%
3Y*
44.17%
5Y*
16.23%
10Y*
12.00%

REAL

1D
4.47%
1M
9.25%
YTD
-34.85%
6M
-28.31%
1Y
92.87%
3Y*
81.13%
5Y*
-12.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. REAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-8.37%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%22.45%
REAL
The RealReal, Inc.
-34.85%44.37%443.78%60.80%-89.23%-40.58%3.66%-32.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and REAL is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. REAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

REAL
REAL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
REAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
REAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
REAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
REAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. REAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and The RealReal, Inc. (REAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXJREALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.80

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

3.95

-0.39

GDXJ vs. REAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the REAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and REAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. REAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, smaller than the maximum REAL drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and REAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXJREALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.66%

-96.44%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.47%

-51.95%

+12.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.47%

-57.16%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.76%

-95.42%

+45.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.25%

-64.43%

+31.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.45%

-67.33%

+6.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.41%

23.62%

-9.21%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. REAL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) at 17.24%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXJREALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.46%

17.24%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.41%

48.58%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.54%

77.43%

-25.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.50%

97.37%

-55.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.23%

93.85%

-49.62%

Dividends

GDXJ vs. REAL - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while REAL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.54%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
REAL
The RealReal, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXJ and REAL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to REAL (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs REAL's -96.44%.

REAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXJ and REAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer