PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXJ vs. ETON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXJ vs. ETON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than ETON's 86.81% return.


GDXJ

1D
3.15%
1M
-19.14%
YTD
-8.37%
6M
-6.68%
1Y
51.06%
3Y*
44.17%
5Y*
16.23%
10Y*
12.00%

ETON

1D
-1.62%
1M
2.50%
YTD
86.81%
6M
89.16%
1Y
117.71%
3Y*
102.22%
5Y*
36.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. ETON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-8.37%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%14.38%
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc
86.81%26.95%204.11%55.32%-34.27%-47.23%12.92%17.65%-4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and ETON is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2018

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. ETON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ETON
ETON Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ETON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETON Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ETON Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETON Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. ETON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXJETONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

3.27

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.55

6.73

-3.18

GDXJ vs. ETON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the ETON Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and ETON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. ETON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than ETON's maximum drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and ETON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXJETONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.66%

-79.94%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.47%

-36.17%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.47%

-45.65%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.76%

-70.42%

+20.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.25%

-9.74%

-23.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.45%

-37.58%

-22.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.41%

17.56%

-3.15%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. ETON - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON) at 17.63%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXJETONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.46%

17.63%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.41%

40.49%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.54%

54.85%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.50%

63.41%

-21.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.23%

63.87%

-19.64%

Dividends

GDXJ vs. ETON - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, while ETON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.54%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXJ and ETON have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to ETON (17.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs ETON's -79.94%.

ETON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXJ and ETON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer