GDXJ vs. DDS
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while DDS (Dillard's, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 12.00%/yr vs 30.59%/yr for DDS. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDXJ vs. DDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than DDS's 0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has underperformed DDS with an annualized return of 12.00%, while DDS has yielded a comparatively higher 30.59% annualized return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -19.14%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 51.06%
- 3Y*
- 44.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
DDS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 14.47%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- -10.45%
- 1Y
- 58.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.17%
- 5Y*
- 35.97%
- 10Y*
- 30.59%
GDXJ vs. DDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -8.37% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
DDS Dillard's, Inc. | 0.66% | 46.81% | 13.47% | 32.05% | 38.66% | 306.41% | -12.71% | 22.76% | 0.97% | -3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and DDS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. DDS — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
DDS
GDXJ vs. DDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Dillard's, Inc. (DDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXJ | DDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 2.42 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 5.60 | -2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. DDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, smaller than the maximum DDS drawdown of -93.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and DDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | DDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -93.62% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.47% | -24.27% | -15.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.47% | -42.02% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.76% | -49.71% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | -76.57% | +18.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.25% | -12.84% | -20.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.45% | -35.61% | -24.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.41% | 10.47% | +3.94% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. DDS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) at 10.15%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | DDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.46% | 10.15% | +9.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.41% | 27.84% | +15.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.54% | 39.57% | +11.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.50% | 50.28% | -8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 59.53% | -15.30% |
Dividends
GDXJ vs. DDS - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than DDS's 5.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDS Dillard's, Inc. | 5.11% | 5.13% | 6.02% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 6.41% | 0.95% | 0.68% | 0.66% | 0.57% | 0.45% | 0.40% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and DDS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to DDS (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs DDS's -93.62%.
DDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and DDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer