GDXJ vs. DAPP
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and DAPP (VanEck Digital Transformation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while DAPP is a Blockchain fund tracking the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDXJ returned 18.66%/yr vs -3.66%/yr for DAPP. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.52% expense ratio.
Performance
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -13.28% return, which is significantly lower than DAPP's 11.01% return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- 6M
- -20.48%
- YTD
- -13.28%
- 1Y
- 55.23%
- 3Y*
- 43.15%
- 5Y*
- 18.66%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.78%
DAPP
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 36.97%
- 5Y*
- -3.66%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.34M | $5.83M | $16.16M | |
| $470.71M | $441.62M | $622.38M |
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -13.28% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -11.91% |
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 11.01% | 15.03% | 44.87% | 285.02% | -85.60% | -45.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and DAPP is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021 | 0.31 |
The correlation between GDXJ and DAPP shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDXJ
DAPP
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDXJ
DAPP
-
Financial Services
GDXJ
DAPP
Communication Services
GDXJ
-
DAPP
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDXJ
-
DAPP
Consumer Defensive
GDXJ
-
DAPP
-
Energy
GDXJ
-
DAPP
-
Healthcare
GDXJ
-
DAPP
-
Industrials
GDXJ
-
DAPP
-
Real Estate
GDXJ
-
DAPP
-
Technology
GDXJ
-
DAPP
Utilities
GDXJ
-
DAPP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
DAPP
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXJ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.09 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 0.30 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 0.54 | +2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, roughly equal to the maximum DAPP drawdown of -92.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and DAPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -92.61% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.32% | -48.21% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.32% | -58.88% | +17.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.79% | -91.90% | +43.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.83% | -44.49% | +7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.25% | -60.78% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.56% | 26.74% | -7.18% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is 14.46%, while VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) has a volatility of 22.16%. This indicates that GDXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.46% | 22.16% | -7.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.31% | 47.86% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.05% | 64.48% | -10.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.11% | 73.16% | -31.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 72.71% | -28.51% |
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GDXJ and DAPP have an expense ratio of 0.52%.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.69% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and DAPP have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAPP has higher volatility (22.16%) compared to GDXJ (14.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs DAPP's -92.61%.
On 5-year performance, GDXJ leads with 18.66% vs -3.66% for DAPP. Both ETFs have the same 0.52% expense ratio. On volatility, GDXJ has been the lower-risk option at 14.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 18.66% return vs -3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ and DAPP have the same expense ratio: 0.52% per year.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for DAPP.
GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while DAPP is Blockchain. GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while DAPP tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index.
GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and DAPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer