GDXJ vs. DAPP
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP).
GDXJ and DAPP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDXJ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index. It was launched on Nov 10, 2009. DAPP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2021. Both GDXJ and DAPP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 5.50% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -10.65% |
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | -9.74% | 15.03% | 44.87% | 285.02% | -85.60% | -38.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly higher than DAPP's -9.74% return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 8.53%
- 1M
- -23.14%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 24.01%
- 1Y
- 114.70%
- 3Y*
- 47.55%
- 5Y*
- 22.70%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
DAPP
- 1D
- 6.88%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- -9.74%
- 6M
- -31.40%
- 1Y
- 65.23%
- 3Y*
- 49.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than DAPP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. DAPP — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
DAPP
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXJ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 0.98 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 1.67 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 1.24 | +2.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 2.72 | +9.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXJ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 0.98 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | -0.17 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and DAPP is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, while DAPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.21% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
DAPP VanEck Digital Transformation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, roughly equal to the maximum DAPP drawdown of -91.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and DAPP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -91.90% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.92% | -48.21% | +15.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.14% | -50.51% | +27.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.91% | -58.23% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.43% | 22.05% | -12.62% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. DAPP - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 20.63% compared to VanEck Digital Transformation ETF (DAPP) at 19.45%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | DAPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.63% | 19.45% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.33% | 50.35% | -8.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.75% | 66.96% | -16.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.56% | 73.29% | -32.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.45% | 73.29% | -28.84% |