GDXJ vs. CSHP
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. GDXJ is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, GDXJ returned 51.11% vs 3.94% for CSHP. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
GDXJ vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -11.62% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.83% return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- -9.91%
- YTD
- -11.62%
- 6M
- -16.20%
- 1Y
- 51.11%
- 3Y*
- 44.53%
- 5Y*
- 17.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -11.62% | 172.28% | -7.80% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.83% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and CSHP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.03 |
The correlation between GDXJ and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
CSHP
GDXJ vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXJ | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -26.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 6.46 | -5.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 65.45 | -64.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 381.67 | -378.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -0.08% | -88.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.47% | -0.06% | -39.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.62% | -0.04% | -35.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.40% | -0.00% | -60.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 0.01% | +15.07% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 20.19% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.19% | 0.16% | +20.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.45% | 0.27% | +44.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.42% | 0.36% | +52.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.71% | 0.41% | +41.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.30% | 0.41% | +43.89% |
GDXJ vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.91% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.63% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and CSHP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (20.19%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, GDXJ leads with 51.11% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 51.11% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.63% for GDXJ.
GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer