PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXJ vs. AG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXJ vs. AG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than AG's 18.81% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has outperformed AG with an annualized return of 13.07%, while AG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.48% annualized return.


GDXJ

1D
-4.40%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-2.55%
6M
6.26%
1Y
65.12%
3Y*
46.12%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
13.07%

AG

1D
-5.81%
1M
2.11%
YTD
18.81%
6M
26.15%
1Y
181.03%
3Y*
49.83%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
5.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-2.55%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%-11.02%8.22%
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
18.81%204.32%-10.47%-25.99%-24.73%-17.24%9.62%108.15%-12.61%-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and AG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010

0.84

The correlation between GDXJ and AG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

AG
AG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
AG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AG Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXJAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

4.24

-2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

9.46

-4.50

GDXJ vs. AG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the AG Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and AG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXJAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.49

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.04

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.09

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.05

+0.01

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, roughly equal to the maximum AG drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and AG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXJAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.66%

-90.20%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.92%

-42.92%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.92%

-42.92%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.99%

-76.89%

+25.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

-80.82%

+23.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.01%

-38.18%

+9.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.50%

-59.21%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.19%

19.23%

-6.04%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. AG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is 16.66%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 22.62%. This indicates that GDXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXJAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.66%

22.62%

-5.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.34%

56.05%

-14.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.79%

73.23%

-23.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.10%

61.33%

-20.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.06%

61.84%

-17.78%

Dividends

GDXJ vs. AG - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than AG's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AG
First Majestic Silver Corp.
0.18%0.12%0.33%0.34%0.31%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.39%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXJ and AG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AG has higher volatility (22.62%) compared to GDXJ (16.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs AG's -90.20%.

AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXJ and AG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer