GDXJ vs. AG
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while AG (First Majestic Silver Corp.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 13.07%/yr vs 5.48%/yr for AG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
GDXJ vs. AG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than AG's 18.81% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has outperformed AG with an annualized return of 13.07%, while AG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.48% annualized return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 65.12%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
AG
- 1D
- -5.81%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 18.81%
- 6M
- 26.15%
- 1Y
- 181.03%
- 3Y*
- 49.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
GDXJ vs. AG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -2.55% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 18.81% | 204.32% | -10.47% | -25.99% | -24.73% | -17.24% | 9.62% | 108.15% | -12.61% | -11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and AG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2010 | 0.84 |
The correlation between GDXJ and AG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. AG — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
AG
GDXJ vs. AG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXJ | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 4.24 | -2.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 9.46 | -4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXJ | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.49 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.04 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.09 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.05 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. AG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, roughly equal to the maximum AG drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and AG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -90.20% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.92% | -42.92% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.92% | -42.92% | +10.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.99% | -76.89% | +25.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | -80.82% | +23.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.01% | -38.18% | +9.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.50% | -59.21% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | 19.23% | -6.04% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. AG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) is 16.66%, while First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) has a volatility of 22.62%. This indicates that GDXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | AG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.66% | 22.62% | -5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.34% | 56.05% | -14.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.79% | 73.23% | -23.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.10% | 61.33% | -20.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.06% | 61.84% | -17.78% |
Dividends
GDXJ vs. AG - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than AG's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AG First Majestic Silver Corp. | 0.18% | 0.12% | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.31% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.39% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and AG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AG has higher volatility (22.62%) compared to GDXJ (16.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs AG's -90.20%.
AG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and AG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer