PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GDX is traded in USD, while XDIV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XDIV.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 19.42% return.


GDX

1D
2.97%
1M
-8.38%
YTD
-6.69%
6M
-5.89%
1Y
48.02%
3Y*
38.96%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
13.29%

XDIV.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
2.75%
YTD
19.42%
6M
18.53%
1Y
36.69%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-6.69%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%3.02%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
19.42%31.02%10.48%14.68%-5.50%33.37%-5.29%30.52%-16.81%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and XDIV.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2017

0.11

The correlation between GDX and XDIV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV.TO
XDIV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDIV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.82

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

11.38

-9.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

38.12

-34.25

GDX vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the XDIV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and XDIV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDX vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and XDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-46.32%

-34.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-3.31%

-32.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-12.20%

-24.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-24.74%

-21.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.91%

0.00%

-30.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.41%

-6.33%

-34.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.11%

0.99%

+12.12%

Volatility

GDX vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 17.20% compared to iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO) at 2.43%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDIV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.20%

2.43%

+14.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.15%

6.86%

+32.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.89%

8.84%

+38.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.74%

12.47%

+24.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.34%

17.75%

+19.59%

GDX vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDX vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than XDIV.TO's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.79%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.25%3.90%4.50%4.42%4.15%3.76%4.85%4.24%5.13%1.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDX and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

GDX is categorized as Gold, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer