PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 13.98%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.07% annualized return.


GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%

USO

1D
2.62%
1M
-4.57%
YTD
103.67%
6M
99.35%
1Y
101.55%
3Y*
29.98%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
4.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
103.67%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%28.97%64.68%-67.79%32.61%-19.57%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and USO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2006

0.23

The correlation between GDX and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXUSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

5.01

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

9.42

-4.29

GDX vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the USO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and USO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.31

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.68

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.10

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

-0.18

+0.30

Drawdowns

GDX vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and USO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-98.19%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.84%

-20.39%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-26.05%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-36.23%

-10.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

-86.75%

+36.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.62%

-85.01%

+58.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.43%

-75.30%

+34.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.99%

10.82%

+1.17%

Volatility

GDX vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO) have volatilities of 15.40% and 14.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.40%

14.87%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.50%

38.23%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.49%

44.20%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.39%

36.06%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

39.00%

-1.82%

GDX vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDX vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDX and USO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to USO (14.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs USO's -98.19%.

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.98% vs 4.07% for USO. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, USO has been the lower-risk option at 14.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.

GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for USO.

GDX is categorized as Gold, while USO is Oil & Gas. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.86% for USO.

USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX and USO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer