GDX vs. QTUM
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDX returned 17.28%/yr vs 27.81%/yr for QTUM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
GDX vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 44.14% return.
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
QTUM
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- 44.14%
- 6M
- 39.20%
- 1Y
- 80.80%
- 3Y*
- 48.48%
- 5Y*
- 27.81%
- 10Y*
- —
GDX vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | 18.64% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 44.14% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and QTUM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.24 |
The correlation between GDX and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDX vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
QTUM
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDX
QTUM
-
Communication Services
GDX
-
QTUM
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
QTUM
-
Energy
GDX
-
QTUM
-
Financial Services
GDX
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
GDX
-
QTUM
Industrials
GDX
-
QTUM
Real Estate
GDX
-
QTUM
-
Technology
GDX
-
QTUM
Utilities
GDX
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
QTUM
GDX vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.47 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 5.32 | -3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 19.76 | -15.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.94 | -1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.04 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.03 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -38.45% | -41.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -15.26% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.09% | -25.39% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -38.45% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.09% | -6.53% | -25.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -8.25% | -32.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 4.10% | +8.32% |
Volatility
GDX vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 13.41%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 13.41% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 22.31% | +16.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 27.73% | +18.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 26.85% | +9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 27.34% | +9.93% |
GDX vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than QTUM's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.74% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and QTUM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to QTUM (13.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 27.81% vs 17.28% for GDX. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 13.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 27.81% return vs 17.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.74% for QTUM.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while QTUM is Technology Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer