GDX vs. IHI
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and IHI (iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while IHI is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 13.29%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for IHI. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IHI.
Performance
GDX vs. IHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly higher than IHI's -20.02% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed IHI with an annualized return of 13.29%, while IHI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.85% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -6.69%
- 6M
- -5.89%
- 1Y
- 50.59%
- 3Y*
- 38.96%
- 5Y*
- 17.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.29%
IHI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- -20.02%
- 6M
- -19.99%
- 1Y
- -18.55%
- 3Y*
- -2.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.53%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
GDX vs. IHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -6.69% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | -20.02% | 6.88% | 8.62% | 3.24% | -19.80% | 21.03% | 24.17% | 32.75% | 15.45% | 30.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and IHI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006 | 0.20 |
GDX vs. IHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
IHI
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDX
IHI
-
Communication Services
GDX
-
IHI
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
IHI
-
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
IHI
-
Energy
GDX
-
IHI
-
Financial Services
GDX
-
IHI
-
Healthcare
GDX
-
IHI
Industrials
GDX
-
IHI
Real Estate
GDX
-
IHI
-
Technology
GDX
-
IHI
-
Utilities
GDX
-
IHI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. IHI — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
IHI
GDX vs. IHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDX | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.83 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | -0.71 | +2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | -1.71 | +5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDX vs. IHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than IHI's maximum drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and IHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -49.65% | -30.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.28% | -26.11% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.28% | -26.64% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -33.12% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -33.25% | -16.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.91% | -24.48% | -6.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.41% | -8.34% | -32.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.11% | 10.84% | +2.27% |
Volatility
GDX vs. IHI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 17.20% compared to iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF (IHI) at 6.31%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | IHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.20% | 6.31% | +10.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.15% | 13.27% | +25.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.89% | 17.21% | +29.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 19.02% | +17.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.34% | 19.82% | +17.52% |
GDX vs. IHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than IHI's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. IHI - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than IHI's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.79% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
IHI iShares U.S. Medical Devices ETF | 0.45% | 0.34% | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.55% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and IHI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to IHI (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs IHI's -49.65%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.29% vs 8.85% for IHI. On fees, IHI is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IHI has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IHI is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.45% for IHI.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while IHI is Health & Biotech Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while IHI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Medical Equipment Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.43% for IHI.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and IHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer