PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX vs. FTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 28.48% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 13.81%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 25.51% annualized return.


GDX

1D
6.55%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
1.22%
1Y
57.71%
3Y*
41.18%
5Y*
19.97%
10Y*
13.81%

FTEC

1D
3.38%
1M
6.58%
YTD
28.48%
6M
30.07%
1Y
56.15%
3Y*
31.16%
5Y*
21.43%
10Y*
25.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.58%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
28.48%22.11%29.40%53.30%-29.59%30.49%45.83%48.93%-0.39%36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and FTEC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.15

Over the past year, GDX and FTEC have become more correlated (0.35) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FTEC
FTEC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXFTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.42

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.47

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

10.80

-6.41

GDX vs. FTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the FTEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and FTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDX vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and FTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXFTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-34.95%

-45.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-16.26%

-20.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-27.30%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-34.95%

-11.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

-34.95%

-14.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.39%

-4.04%

-22.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.41%

-5.57%

-34.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.22%

5.21%

+8.01%

Volatility

GDX vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 18.56% compared to Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) at 10.43%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXFTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.56%

10.43%

+8.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.52%

18.33%

+21.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.30%

22.26%

+25.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.86%

25.49%

+11.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.37%

24.84%

+12.53%

GDX vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDX vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, more than FTEC's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
0.33%0.43%0.49%0.77%0.93%0.63%0.83%1.03%1.20%0.96%1.25%1.27%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDX and FTEC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (18.56%) compared to FTEC (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs FTEC's -34.95%.

On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 25.51% vs 13.81% for GDX. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FTEC has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 25.51% return vs 13.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

GDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.33% for FTEC.

GDX is categorized as Gold, while FTEC is Technology Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.08% for FTEC.

FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX and FTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer