GDX vs. COPX
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 13.98%/yr vs 21.95%/yr for COPX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
GDX vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 13.98%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.95% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- -3.46%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 5.62%
- 1Y
- 61.27%
- 3Y*
- 41.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
GDX vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -0.90% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and COPX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010 | 0.46 |
The correlation between GDX and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (10 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDX vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
COPX
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDX
COPX
Communication Services
GDX
-
COPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
COPX
-
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
COPX
-
Energy
GDX
-
COPX
-
Financial Services
GDX
-
COPX
-
Healthcare
GDX
-
COPX
-
Industrials
GDX
-
COPX
Real Estate
GDX
-
COPX
-
Technology
GDX
-
COPX
-
Utilities
GDX
-
COPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
COPX
GDX vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.42 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 4.37 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 14.00 | -8.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.93 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.62 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.19 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, roughly equal to the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -83.16% | +2.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.84% | -27.82% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.84% | -39.72% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -42.12% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -65.41% | +15.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.62% | -5.69% | -20.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -39.30% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.99% | 8.66% | +3.33% |
Volatility
GDX vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) have volatilities of 15.40% and 15.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.40% | 15.38% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.50% | 35.68% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.49% | 41.41% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 36.51% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.18% | 35.55% | +1.63% |
GDX vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.74% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and COPX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to COPX (15.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs COPX's -83.16%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.95% vs 13.98% for GDX. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.95% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while COPX is Materials. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.65% for COPX.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer