PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX vs. COPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX vs. COPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed COPX with an annualized return of 13.98%, while COPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.95% annualized return.


GDX

1D
-3.46%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
5.62%
1Y
61.27%
3Y*
41.00%
5Y*
18.69%
10Y*
13.98%

COPX

1D
-3.64%
1M
17.74%
YTD
25.71%
6M
36.90%
1Y
120.82%
3Y*
37.36%
5Y*
19.87%
10Y*
21.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-0.90%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
25.71%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and COPX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010

0.46

The correlation between GDX and COPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (10 years) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDX vs. COPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDX
COPX

Basic Materials

100.0%
96.3%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GDX
100.0%
COPX
96.3%

Communication Services

GDX

-

COPX

-

Consumer Cyclical

GDX

-

COPX

-

Consumer Defensive

GDX

-

COPX

-

Energy

GDX

-

COPX

-

Financial Services

GDX

-

COPX

-

Healthcare

GDX

-

COPX

-

Industrials

GDX

-

COPX
3.7%

Real Estate

GDX

-

COPX

-

Technology

GDX

-

COPX

-

Utilities

GDX

-

COPX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXCOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

4.37

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.13

14.00

-8.88

GDX vs. COPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the COPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and COPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXCOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.93

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.55

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.62

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.19

-0.06

Drawdowns

GDX vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, roughly equal to the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and COPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXCOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-83.16%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.84%

-27.82%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-39.72%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-42.12%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

-65.41%

+15.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.62%

-5.69%

-20.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.43%

-39.30%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.99%

8.66%

+3.33%

Volatility

GDX vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) have volatilities of 15.40% and 15.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXCOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.40%

15.38%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.50%

35.68%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.49%

41.41%

+4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.39%

36.51%

-0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.18%

35.55%

+1.63%

GDX vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDX vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.13%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.74%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDX and COPX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (15.40%) compared to COPX (15.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs COPX's -83.16%.

On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.95% vs 13.98% for GDX. On fees, GDX is cheaper at 0.51% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.95% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDX is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.74% for GDX.

GDX is categorized as Gold, while COPX is Materials. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.65% for COPX.

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX and COPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer