GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L
GDWN.L (Goodwin plc) and SMSN.L (Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd) are both stocks. GDWN.L operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while SMSN.L operates in Consumer Electronics (Technology). Over the past 10 years, GDWN.L returned 26.89%/yr vs 27.21%/yr for SMSN.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GDWN.L is traded in GBp, while SMSN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMSN.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDWN.L achieves a -24.09% return, which is significantly lower than SMSN.L's 151.41% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GDWN.L having a 26.89% annualized return and SMSN.L not far ahead at 27.21%.
GDWN.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 15.35%
- YTD
- -24.09%
- 6M
- -18.95%
- 1Y
- 120.60%
- 3Y*
- 57.62%
- 5Y*
- 44.86%
- 10Y*
- 26.89%
SMSN.L
- 1D
- -12.55%
- 1M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 151.41%
- 6M
- 175.72%
- 1Y
- 400.13%
- 3Y*
- 55.88%
- 5Y*
- 26.95%
- 10Y*
- 27.21%
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDWN.L Goodwin plc | -24.09% | 183.74% | 39.33% | 77.26% | 5.33% | 9.16% | 5.16% | 21.66% | 28.51% | 18.73% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 151.41% | 114.37% | -36.86% | 31.43% | -23.16% | -7.14% | 55.31% | 36.17% | -20.92% | 48.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDWN.L and SMSN.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2007 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, GDWN.L and SMSN.L have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GDWN.L:
£1.21B
SMSN.L:
$1.37T
GDWN.L:
£7.88
SMSN.L:
₩320.04K
GDWN.L:
20.41
SMSN.L:
24.36
GDWN.L:
1.06
SMSN.L:
0.73
GDWN.L:
2.69
SMSN.L:
5.39
GDWN.L:
11.93
SMSN.L:
4.44
GDWN.L:
£448.99M
SMSN.L:
₩389.99T
GDWN.L:
£210.33M
SMSN.L:
₩152.35T
GDWN.L:
£107.20M
SMSN.L:
₩68.67T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L — Risk / Return Rank
GDWN.L
SMSN.L
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goodwin plc (GDWN.L) and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDWN.L | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.73 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 19.42 | -17.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 57.77 | -53.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDWN.L drawdown since its inception was -99.25%, which is greater than SMSN.L's maximum drawdown of -49.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDWN.L and SMSN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDWN.L | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.25% | -49.90% | -49.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.56% | -20.44% | -39.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.56% | -43.39% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.56% | -43.39% | -16.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.56% | -49.90% | -9.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.55% | -14.87% | -59.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.42% | -15.99% | -76.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.40% | 6.89% | +19.51% |
Volatility
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goodwin plc (GDWN.L) is 15.08%, while Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (SMSN.L) has a volatility of 25.45%. This indicates that GDWN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMSN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDWN.L | SMSN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.08% | 25.45% | -10.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.58% | 46.00% | +12.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.02% | 52.71% | +22.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.07% | 34.45% | +13.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.35% | 32.77% | +11.58% |
Dividends
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L - Dividend Comparison
GDWN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than SMSN.L's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDWN.L Goodwin plc | 5.05% | 3.47% | 1.58% | 1.93% | 1.62% | 3.17% | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.31% | 2.09% | 2.42% | 2.30% |
SMSN.L Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | 0.37% | 0.94% | 2.88% | 1.79% | 2.50% | 1.85% | 3.60% | 2.47% | 3.65% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.71% |
Financials
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Goodwin plc and Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GDWN.L vs. SMSN.L - Profitability Comparison
GDWN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goodwin plc reported a gross profit of 66.92M and revenue of 135.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.4%.
SMSN.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a gross profit of 81.91T and revenue of 133.87T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.
GDWN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goodwin plc reported an operating income of 37.16M and revenue of 135.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 27.4%.
SMSN.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported an operating income of 58.98T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in an operating margin of 44.1%.
GDWN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Goodwin plc reported a net income of 26.41M and revenue of 135.61M, resulting in a net margin of 19.5%.
SMSN.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd reported a net income of 48.66T and revenue of 133.87T, resulting in a net margin of 36.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDWN.L and SMSN.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GDWN.L and SMSN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer