GDT vs. TBFC
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and TBFC (The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TBFC.
Performance
GDT vs. TBFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBFC
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 15.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. TBFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -8.05% |
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF | 3.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and TBFC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. TBFC — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
TBFC
GDT vs. TBFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDT | TBFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 1.51 | -2.13 |
Drawdowns
GDT vs. TBFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, which is greater than TBFC's maximum drawdown of -8.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and TBFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | TBFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -8.89% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.07% | -0.31% | -15.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -1.06% | -8.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.29% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. TBFC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | TBFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.36% | 6.35% | +27.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 7.14% | +26.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 7.14% | +26.22% |
GDT vs. TBFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TBFC's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. TBFC - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than TBFC's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TBFC The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF | 2.93% | 3.28% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and TBFC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TBFC.
TBFC has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.77% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Brinsmere. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.44% for TBFC.
Find the right allocation for GDT and TBFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer