PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDT vs. TBFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDT vs. TBFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GDT

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TBFC

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.49%
YTD
5.69%
6M
6.22%
1Y
15.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDT vs. TBFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDT and TBFC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDT vs. TBFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDT

TBFC
TBFC Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TBFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBFC Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TBFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDT vs. TBFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF (TBFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDT vs. TBFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDTTBFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.63

1.51

-2.13

Drawdowns

GDT vs. TBFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, which is greater than TBFC's maximum drawdown of -8.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and TBFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDTTBFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.06%

-8.89%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.07%

-0.31%

-15.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.90%

-1.06%

-8.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

Volatility

GDT vs. TBFC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDTTBFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.36%

6.35%

+27.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.36%

7.14%

+26.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.36%

7.14%

+26.22%

GDT vs. TBFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TBFC's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDT vs. TBFC - Dividend Comparison

GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than TBFC's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GDT
WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund
1.77%0.00%0.00%
TBFC
The Brinsmere Fund - Conservative ETF
2.93%3.28%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDT and TBFC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TBFC.

TBFC has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.77% for GDT.

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Brinsmere. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.44% for TBFC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDT and TBFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer