GDT vs. NTSX
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.
Performance
GDT vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSX
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 21.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.24% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and NTSX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NTSX
GDT vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.09 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and NTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -31.34% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.43% | -0.96% | -21.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -6.73% | -5.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | NTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 13.10% | +18.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 17.17% | +14.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 18.25% | +13.66% |
GDT vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than NTSX's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | 1.09% | 1.14% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.36% | 0.82% | 0.92% | 1.42% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and NTSX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GDT.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.09% for NTSX.
GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.20% for NTSX.
Find the right allocation for GDT and NTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer