GDT vs. NTSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.

Performance

GDT vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GDT

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSX

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 7.83%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 19.38%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDT vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	-8.05%
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	8.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GDT and NTSX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026	0.39

Return for Risk

GDT vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NTSX

NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 60
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDT vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDT	NTSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.63	0.71	-1.34

Drawdowns

GDT vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, smaller than the maximum NTSX drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and NTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDT	NTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.06%	-31.34%	+13.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.07%	-1.05%	-15.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.90%	-6.79%	-3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDT	NTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.58%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.36%	12.31%	+21.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.36%	17.04%	+16.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.36%	18.27%	+15.09%

GDT vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDT vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	1.08%	1.14%	1.14%	1.21%	1.36%	0.82%	0.92%	1.42%	0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDT and NTSX in my portfolio?

GDT and NTSX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDT or NTSX?

On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDT or NTSX?

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for GDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDT or NTSX?

GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

What is the main difference between GDT and NTSX?

GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.20% for NTSX.