GDT vs. CEFZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for CEFZ.

Performance

GDT vs. CEFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GDT

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -2.50%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEFZ

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.24%
• 6M: 4.54%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDT vs. CEFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	-14.24%
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	3.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GDT and CEFZ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.41

Return for Risk

GDT vs. CEFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

GDT vs. CEFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, which is greater than CEFZ's maximum drawdown of -6.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and CEFZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDT	CEFZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.66%	-6.66%	-18.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.43%	-0.81%	-21.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.26%	-1.20%	-11.06%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDT	CEFZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.91%	10.39%	+21.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.91%	10.39%	+21.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.91%	10.39%	+21.52%

GDT vs. CEFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFZ's 3.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDT vs. CEFZ - Dividend Comparison

GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than CEFZ's 9.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	9.13%	4.17%
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	2.70%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDT and CEFZ in my portfolio?

GDT and CEFZ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDT or CEFZ?

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDT or CEFZ?

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDT or CEFZ?

CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 9.13%, compared with 2.70% for GDT.

What is the main difference between GDT and CEFZ?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 3.36% for CEFZ.