GDT vs. ASGM
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for ASGM.
Performance
GDT vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASGM
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 22.52%
- 6M
- 24.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -8.05% |
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 16.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and ASGM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDT | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | 2.95 | -3.57 |
Drawdowns
GDT vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and ASGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -6.62% | -11.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.07% | -0.53% | -15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -1.22% | -8.68% |
Volatility
GDT vs. ASGM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | ASGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.36% | 15.67% | +17.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 15.67% | +17.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 15.67% | +17.69% |
GDT vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than ASGM's 3.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF | 3.69% | 4.52% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.77% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and ASGM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.
ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 1.77% for GDT.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.86% for ASGM.
Find the right allocation for GDT and ASGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer