GDOC vs. UNHW
GDOC (Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDOC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GDOC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.
Performance
GDOC vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDOC achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 28.89% return.
GDOC
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.65%
UNHW
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- 6M
- 54.46%
- YTD
- 28.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.39K | $11.72K | $75.91K | |
| $423.60K | $609.21K | $366.99K |
GDOC vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.66% | -2.09% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 28.89% | 1.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDOC and UNHW is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDOC vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank
GDOC
UNHW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDOC vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDOC | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDOC vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDOC drawdown since its inception was -31.01%, roughly equal to the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOC and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDOC | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.01% | -32.28% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.82% | -5.84% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.66% | -9.80% | -5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | — | — |
Volatility
GDOC vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDOC | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 46.31% | -30.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 46.31% | -27.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 46.31% | -27.59% |
GDOC vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDOC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDOC vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
GDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than UNHW's 22.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 22.57% | 2.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDOC and UNHW have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDOC is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDOC is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 22.57%, compared with 0.32% for GDOC.
GDOC is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GDOC and 0.99% for UNHW.
Find the right allocation for GDOC and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer