GDOC vs. TRUH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GDOC (Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GDOC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.

Performance

GDOC vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GDOC

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -3.14%
• 6M: 0.88%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 1Y: 15.93%
• 3Y*: 3.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.65%

TRUH

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -0.53%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF	$19.39K	$11.72K	$75.91K
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	$24.34K	$32.62K	$24.57K

GDOC vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF	8.36%
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GDOC and TRUH is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.85

Return for Risk

GDOC vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDOC

GDOC Risk / Return Rank: 33
GDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
GDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 26

TRUH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDOC vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDOC	TRUH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.21	—	—

Drawdowns

GDOC vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDOC drawdown since its inception was -31.01%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOC and TRUH.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDOC	TRUH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.01%	-4.51%	-26.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.82%	-2.99%	-4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.66%	-1.66%	-14.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDOC	TRUH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.11%	17.52%	-1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.72%	17.52%	+1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	17.52%	+1.20%

GDOC vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDOC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDOC vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison

GDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF	0.32%	0.32%	0.02%	0.55%	0.00%
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDOC and TRUH in my portfolio?

GDOC and TRUH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDOC or TRUH?

On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDOC or TRUH?

TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDOC or TRUH?

GDOC has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.

What is the main difference between GDOC and TRUH?

They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GDOC and 0.10% for TRUH.