GDOC vs. GHYB
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB).
GDOC and GHYB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDOC is an actively managed fund by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Nov 9, 2021. GHYB is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017.
Performance
GDOC vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDOC vs. GHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | -8.12% | 10.74% | -1.66% | 4.60% | -17.12% | -2.77% |
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | -0.61% | 9.38% | 7.76% | 12.13% | -11.02% | 0.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDOC achieves a -8.12% return, which is significantly lower than GHYB's -0.61% return.
GDOC
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- -8.12%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 1.53%
- 3Y*
- 0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GHYB
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDOC vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDOC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GDOC vs. GHYB — Risk / Return Rank
GDOC
GHYB
GDOC vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDOC | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.08 | 1.33 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | 2.00 | -1.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.32 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 1.78 | -1.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 9.23 | -8.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDOC | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 1.33 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.53 | -0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDOC and GHYB is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GDOC vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison
GDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than GHYB's 7.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GHYB Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 7.08% | 7.00% | 6.65% | 6.20% | 5.67% | 4.46% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
GDOC vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDOC drawdown since its inception was -31.01%, which is greater than GHYB's maximum drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOC and GHYB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDOC | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.01% | -21.48% | -9.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.57% | -4.12% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.86% | -1.57% | -14.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.90% | -2.62% | -13.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 0.79% | +4.17% |
Volatility
GDOC vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) at 2.04%. This indicates that GDOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDOC | GHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 2.04% | +4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 2.67% | +8.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.63% | 5.53% | +13.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 7.68% | +11.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 8.35% | +10.48% |