GDOC vs. BBH
GDOC (Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF) and BBH (VanEck Biotech ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. GDOC is actively managed, while BBH is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDOC returned 3.79%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for BBH. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GDOC charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BBH.
Performance
GDOC vs. BBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDOC achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than BBH's 7.93% return.
GDOC
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.65%
BBH
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 1Y
- 26.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.25%
- 5Y*
- -0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.67%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.24M | $1.09M | $974.35K | |
| $19.39K | $11.72K | $75.91K |
GDOC vs. BBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.66% | 10.74% | -1.66% | 4.60% | -17.12% | -2.73% |
BBH VanEck Biotech ETF | 7.93% | 21.18% | -4.29% | 3.94% | -15.25% | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDOC and BBH is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021 | 0.82 |
The correlation between GDOC and BBH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
GDOC vs. BBH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDOC
BBH
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
GDOC
BBH
Consumer Defensive
GDOC
BBH
-
Basic Materials
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Communication Services
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Energy
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Financial Services
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Industrials
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Real Estate
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Technology
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Utilities
GDOC
-
BBH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDOC vs. BBH — Risk / Return Rank
GDOC
BBH
GDOC vs. BBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDOC | BBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.50 | -1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 5.91 | -3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDOC vs. BBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDOC drawdown since its inception was -31.01%, smaller than the maximum BBH drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOC and BBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDOC | BBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.01% | -72.70% | +41.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | -10.55% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.51% | -22.74% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.82% | -5.22% | -2.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.66% | -20.67% | +5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.22% | 4.46% | +2.76% |
Volatility
GDOC vs. BBH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) is 3.77%, while VanEck Biotech ETF (BBH) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that GDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDOC | BBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 5.31% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.46% | 14.79% | -2.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 19.49% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 21.53% | -2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 22.10% | -3.38% |
GDOC vs. BBH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDOC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BBH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDOC vs. BBH - Dividend Comparison
GDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than BBH's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBH VanEck Biotech ETF | 0.47% | 0.51% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.47% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.55% | 0.30% | 0.27% |
GDOC Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.02% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDOC and BBH have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBH has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to GDOC (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDOC dropped -31.01% vs BBH's -72.70%.
On 3-year performance, BBH leads with 9.25% vs 3.79% for GDOC. On fees, BBH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GDOC has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BBH has performed better with a 9.25% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GDOC.
BBH has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.32% for GDOC.
They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GDOC and 0.35% for BBH.
BBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDOC and BBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer