PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDMN vs. KGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDMN vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMN achieves a -13.77% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's -8.92% return.


GDMN

1D
2.11%
1M
-23.27%
YTD
-13.77%
6M
-13.73%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
56.30%
5Y*
10Y*

KGC

1D
2.90%
1M
-18.08%
YTD
-8.92%
6M
-8.14%
1Y
65.63%
3Y*
76.13%
5Y*
29.09%
10Y*
18.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDMN vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-13.77%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%6.93%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-8.92%206.11%55.63%51.83%-27.59%15.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GDMN and KGC is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.84

The correlation between GDMN and KGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDMN vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDMN vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDMNKGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.75

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

5.20

-2.05

GDMN vs. KGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMN and KGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDMN vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMN drawdown since its inception was -52.82%, smaller than the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMN and KGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDMNKGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.82%

-96.00%

+43.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.76%

-37.69%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.76%

-37.69%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.39%

-32.63%

-10.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-57.60%

+38.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.01%

12.66%

+5.35%

Volatility

GDMN vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a higher volatility of 21.98% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 18.21%. This indicates that GDMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDMNKGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.98%

18.21%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.30%

40.59%

+13.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.44%

51.35%

+12.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.07%

44.22%

+3.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.07%

47.01%

+1.06%

Dividends

GDMN vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than KGC's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
3.13%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.57%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDMN and KGC have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (21.98%) compared to KGC (18.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMN dropped -52.82% vs KGC's -96.00%.

KGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDMN and KGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer