GDMN vs. DGRW

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DGRW is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. GDMN is actively managed, while DGRW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDMN returned 54.79%/yr vs 15.28%/yr for DGRW. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GDMN charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.

Performance

GDMN vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMN achieves a -21.29% return, which is significantly lower than DGRW's 10.05% return.

GDMN

• 1D: 1.66%
• 1M: -4.40%
• 6M: -30.05%
• YTD: -21.29%
• 1Y: 49.41%
• 3Y*: 54.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.15%

DGRW

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 2.07%
• 6M: 6.86%
• YTD: 10.05%
• 1Y: 17.60%
• 3Y*: 15.28%
• 5Y*: 11.72%
• 10Y*: 13.79%
• ALL TIME*: 13.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	$51.74M	$49.20M	$56.02M
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	$1.47M	$2.23M	$3.42M

GDMN vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-21.29%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	10.05%	12.17%	16.98%	18.66%	-6.33%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GDMN and DGRW is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.23

The correlation between GDMN and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDMN vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GDMN	DGRW
Basic Materials	100.0%	2.8%
Communication Services	-	11.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.7%
Energy	-	4.5%
Financial Services	-	8.4%
Healthcare	-	12.8%
Industrials	-	11.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	33.8%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

GDMN vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 31
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 25

DGRW

DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 70
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 74
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDMN vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDMN	DGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	1.69	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.41	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.31	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	2.13	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.99	8.60	-6.62

GDMN vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMN Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is lower than the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMN and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDMN vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMN drawdown since its inception was -52.82%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMN and DGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDMN	DGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.82%	-32.04%	-20.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.02%	-8.30%	-43.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-52.02%	-16.21%	-35.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.27%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.33%	0.00%	-48.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.85%	-3.00%	-16.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.95%	2.05%	+22.90%

Volatility

GDMN vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a higher volatility of 14.93% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.19%. This indicates that GDMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDMN	DGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.93%	3.19%	+11.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.31%	8.44%	+40.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.05%	10.47%	+54.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	48.34%	14.02%	+34.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.34%	16.19%	+32.15%

GDMN vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDMN has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDMN vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than DGRW's 1.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund	1.26%	1.43%	1.55%	1.74%	2.15%	1.78%	1.93%	2.20%	2.42%	1.71%	2.13%	2.18%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.43%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDMN and DGRW in my portfolio?

GDMN and DGRW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDMN or DGRW?

GDMN has higher volatility (14.93%) compared to DGRW (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMN dropped -52.82% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

Which ETF is better, GDMN or DGRW?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 54.79% vs 15.28% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDMN or DGRW?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 54.79% return vs 15.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDMN or DGRW?

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDMN or DGRW?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 1.26% for DGRW.

What is the main difference between GDMN and DGRW?

GDMN is categorized as Commodities, while DGRW is Quality Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for GDMN and 0.28% for DGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.