GDMN vs. DGICA
GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while DGICA (Donegal Group Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, GDMN returned 60.95%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for DGICA. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GDMN vs. DGICA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDMN achieves a -4.13% return, which is significantly higher than DGICA's -15.44% return.
GDMN
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -4.13%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 76.93%
- 3Y*
- 60.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGICA
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- -15.44%
- 6M
- -15.23%
- 1Y
- -13.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
GDMN vs. DGICA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -4.13% | 237.09% | 28.23% | 12.97% | -14.62% | 5.11% |
DGICA Donegal Group Inc. | -15.44% | 34.64% | 15.93% | 3.15% | 4.02% | -0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDMN and DGICA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDMN vs. DGICA — Risk / Return Rank
GDMN
DGICA
GDMN vs. DGICA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) and Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDMN | DGICA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.92 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | -0.66 | +2.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | -1.25 | +5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDMN | DGICA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | -0.57 | +1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.23 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
GDMN vs. DGICA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDMN drawdown since its inception was -52.82%, which is greater than DGICA's maximum drawdown of -43.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMN and DGICA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDMN | DGICA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.82% | -43.36% | -9.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.03% | -20.43% | -18.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.03% | -20.43% | -18.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.06% | -19.36% | -17.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.89% | -14.20% | -4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 10.82% | +5.69% |
Volatility
GDMN vs. DGICA - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a higher volatility of 17.94% compared to Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) at 6.00%. This indicates that GDMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGICA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDMN | DGICA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.94% | 6.00% | +11.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.79% | 16.43% | +35.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.32% | 23.82% | +37.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.59% | 23.29% | +24.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.59% | 25.41% | +22.18% |
Dividends
GDMN vs. DGICA - Dividend Comparison
GDMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than DGICA's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGICA Donegal Group Inc. | 4.47% | 3.60% | 4.44% | 4.82% | 4.61% | 4.41% | 4.23% | 3.90% | 4.16% | 3.22% | 3.13% | 3.81% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 2.82% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDMN and DGICA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDMN has higher volatility (17.94%) compared to DGICA (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMN dropped -52.82% vs DGICA's -43.36%.
GDMN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDMN and DGICA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer