GDIV vs. SCHX
GDIV (Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. GDIV is actively managed, while SCHX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDIV returned 16.87%/yr vs 22.38%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
GDIV vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDIV achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 10.72% return.
GDIV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 27.36%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.41%
GDIV vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDIV Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF | 11.37% | 10.81% | 14.83% | 16.45% | -1.53% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 10.72% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDIV and SCHX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between GDIV and SCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
GDIV vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDIV
SCHX
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Communication Services
-
Technology
GDIV
SCHX
Financial Services
GDIV
SCHX
Industrials
GDIV
SCHX
Healthcare
GDIV
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
GDIV
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
GDIV
SCHX
Energy
GDIV
SCHX
Utilities
GDIV
SCHX
Basic Materials
GDIV
SCHX
Real Estate
GDIV
SCHX
Communication Services
GDIV
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDIV vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
GDIV
SCHX
GDIV vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDIV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.05 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.49 | 13.85 | -3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDIV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.29 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.85 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
GDIV vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDIV drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIV and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDIV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.93% | -34.33% | +15.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -9.02% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.93% | -19.04% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.70% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -3.97% | +0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 1.98% | +0.34% |
Volatility
GDIV vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) at 2.91%. This indicates that GDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDIV | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.91% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 9.02% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.89% | 11.99% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 17.12% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 18.15% | -2.83% |
GDIV vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDIV vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
GDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than SCHX's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDIV Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF | 1.13% | 1.19% | 1.30% | 2.27% | 5.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDIV and SCHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDIV has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to SCHX (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDIV dropped -18.93% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 3-year performance, SCHX leads with 22.38% vs 16.87% for GDIV. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 22.38% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GDIV.
GDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 1.01% for SCHX.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GDIV and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDIV and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer