GDIV vs. MAPP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDIV (Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF) and MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDIV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while MAPP is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Harbor. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GDIV returned 24.33% vs 21.23% for MAPP. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDIV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for MAPP.

Performance

GDIV vs. MAPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDIV achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than MAPP's 7.25% return.

GDIV

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 6M: 11.88%
• 1Y: 24.33%
• 3Y*: 16.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAPP

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDIV vs. MAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GDIV Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF	11.37%	10.81%	14.83%	7.23%
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	7.25%	18.67%	14.25%	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GDIV and MAPP is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.82

The correlation between GDIV and MAPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

GDIV vs. MAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GDIV	MAPP
Technology	23.4%	36.9%
Financial Services	18.2%	15.0%
Industrials	16.2%	8.2%
Healthcare	14.4%	5.4%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	5.4%
Energy	5.0%	2.3%
Utilities	4.1%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.4%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.6%
Communication Services	-	12.2%

Return for Risk

GDIV vs. MAPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDIV

GDIV Risk / Return Rank: 60
GDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
GDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
GDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 62
GDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
GDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 60

MAPP

MAPP Risk / Return Rank: 73
MAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
MAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 73
MAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDIV vs. MAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) and Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDIV	MAPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	2.39	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	3.37	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.43	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	3.45	-0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.49	13.70	-3.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDIV vs. MAPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the MAPP Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDIV and MAPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDIV	MAPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	2.39	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	1.53	-0.69

Drawdowns

GDIV vs. MAPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDIV drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, which is greater than MAPP's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDIV and MAPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDIV	MAPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.93%	-12.92%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-6.17%	-3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.65%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-1.38%	-1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	1.55%	+0.77%

Volatility

GDIV vs. MAPP - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) at 2.98%. This indicates that GDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDIV	MAPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	2.98%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.30%	7.07%	+2.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.89%	8.94%	+2.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.32%	10.75%	+4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.32%	10.75%	+4.57%

GDIV vs. MAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDIV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MAPP's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDIV vs. MAPP - Dividend Comparison

GDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than MAPP's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDIV Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF	1.13%	1.19%	1.30%	2.27%	5.88%
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	2.76%	2.96%	2.41%	2.78%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDIV and MAPP in my portfolio?

GDIV and MAPP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDIV or MAPP?

GDIV has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to MAPP (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDIV dropped -18.93% vs MAPP's -12.92%.

Which ETF is better, GDIV or MAPP?

On 1-year performance, GDIV leads with 24.33% vs 21.23% for MAPP. On fees, GDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MAPP has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDIV or MAPP?

Over the 1-year period, GDIV has performed better with a 24.33% return vs 21.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDIV or MAPP?

GDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.92% for MAPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDIV or MAPP?

MAPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.13% for GDIV.

What is the main difference between GDIV and MAPP?

GDIV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MAPP is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for GDIV and 0.92% for MAPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.