GDGB.L vs. GIGB
GDGB.L (VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF) and GIGB (Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDGB.L is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while GIGB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDGB.L returned 18.43%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for GIGB. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDGB.L charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for GIGB.
Performance
GDGB.L vs. GIGB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GDGB.L is traded in GBP, while GIGB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GIGB values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDGB.L achieves a -6.93% return, which is significantly lower than GIGB's 1.51% return.
GDGB.L
- 1D
- 5.48%
- 1M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -6.93%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- 49.43%
- 3Y*
- 35.53%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- —
GIGB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 7.12%
- 3Y*
- 3.27%
- 5Y*
- 1.35%
- 10Y*
- —
GDGB.L vs. GIGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDGB.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | -6.93% | 138.26% | 11.24% | 3.69% | 3.04% | -10.47% | 19.56% | 38.86% | -5.04% | -3.87% |
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 1.51% | -0.09% | 3.46% | 3.36% | -5.79% | -0.71% | 6.63% | 10.67% | 3.01% | -3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDGB.L and GIGB is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.04 |
The correlation between GDGB.L and GIGB shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDGB.L vs. GIGB — Risk / Return Rank
GDGB.L
GIGB
GDGB.L vs. GIGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L) and Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDGB.L | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 1.37 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.20 | 3.55 | +0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDGB.L vs. GIGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDGB.L drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, which is greater than GIGB's maximum drawdown of -16.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDGB.L and GIGB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDGB.L | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.80% | -16.48% | -24.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.64% | -5.10% | -29.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.64% | -9.01% | -25.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.49% | -12.80% | -22.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.57% | -5.34% | -25.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.54% | -7.41% | -10.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.38% | 1.96% | +10.42% |
Volatility
GDGB.L vs. GIGB - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L) has a higher volatility of 14.08% compared to Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) at 1.45%. This indicates that GDGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDGB.L | GIGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.08% | 1.45% | +12.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.68% | 4.77% | +29.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.88% | 6.23% | +36.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.90% | 8.97% | +23.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.21% | 9.92% | +22.29% |
GDGB.L vs. GIGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDGB.L has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than GIGB's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDGB.L vs. GIGB - Dividend Comparison
GDGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDGB.L VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GIGB Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.69% | 4.45% | 3.67% | 3.12% | 2.25% | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.31% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDGB.L and GIGB have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GIGB is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GIGB is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for GDGB.L.
GDGB.L is categorized as Gold, while GIGB is Corporate Bonds. GDGB.L tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while GIGB tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for GDGB.L and 0.14% for GIGB.
Find the right allocation for GDGB.L and GIGB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer