GDGB.L vs. AUCP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L).
GDGB.L and AUCP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GDGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Mar 25, 2015. AUCP.L is a passively managed fund by LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2008. Both GDGB.L and AUCP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GDGB.L or AUCP.L.
Key characteristics
| GDGB.L | AUCP.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.17% | 34.98% |
| 1Y Return | 31.65% | 43.95% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.13% | 12.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.46% | 10.34% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.19 | 1.31 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.79 | 1.96 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.91 | 1.17 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.94 | 6.09 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.05% | 7.84% |
| Daily Std Dev | 29.27% | 36.48% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.80% | -77.57% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.38% | -10.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDGB.L and AUCP.L is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GDGB.L vs. AUCP.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GDGB.L achieves a 25.17% return, which is significantly lower than AUCP.L's 34.98% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDGB.L vs. AUCP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDGB.L has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than AUCP.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GDGB.L vs. AUCP.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GDGB.L vs. AUCP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDGB.L nor AUCP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GDGB.L vs. AUCP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDGB.L drawdown since its inception was -40.80%, smaller than the maximum AUCP.L drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDGB.L and AUCP.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GDGB.L vs. AUCP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Gold Miners UCITS ETF (GDGB.L) is 7.12%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that GDGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.