GDE vs. VEA
GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. GDE is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDE returned 44.47%/yr vs 18.65%/yr for VEA. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
GDE vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDE achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 12.02% return.
GDE
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 8.50%
- 1Y
- 47.93%
- 3Y*
- 44.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 28.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
GDE vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 5.74% | 73.76% | 44.79% | 33.85% | -18.67% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 12.02% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -9.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDE and VEA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.68 |
The correlation between GDE and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
GDE vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDE
VEA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
GDE
VEA
Financial Services
GDE
VEA
Communication Services
GDE
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
GDE
VEA
Healthcare
GDE
VEA
Industrials
GDE
VEA
Consumer Defensive
GDE
VEA
Energy
GDE
VEA
Utilities
GDE
VEA
Real Estate
GDE
VEA
Basic Materials
GDE
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDE vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
GDE
VEA
GDE vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDE | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.42 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 9.39 | -2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDE | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.75 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.24 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
GDE vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDE drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDE and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDE | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -60.68% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.66% | -11.63% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -13.45% | -9.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.44% | -3.40% | -11.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -13.29% | +5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 3.00% | +4.40% |
Volatility
GDE vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 6.03%. This indicates that GDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDE | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 6.03% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.04% | 13.91% | +11.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.09% | 16.15% | +12.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 16.63% | +9.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 17.40% | +8.86% |
GDE vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GDE vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than VEA's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 4.09% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.69% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDE and VEA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to VEA (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDE dropped -32.01% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 44.47% vs 18.65% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 44.47% return vs 18.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GDE.
GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 2.69% for VEA.
GDE is categorized as Gold, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GDE and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDE and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer