PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDE vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDE vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GDE

1D
0.67%
1M
-9.19%
YTD
3.16%
6M
4.00%
1Y
41.34%
3Y*
42.64%
5Y*
10Y*

DRAM

1D
-0.17%
1M
19.20%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDE vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDE and DRAM is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.51

GDE vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDE
DRAM

Technology

35.6%
100.0%

Financial Services

12.2%

-

Communication Services

12.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.3%

-

Industrials

7.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Energy

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.1%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Technology

GDE
35.6%
DRAM
100.0%

Financial Services

GDE
12.2%
DRAM

-

Communication Services

GDE
12.2%
DRAM

-

Consumer Cyclical

GDE
10.1%
DRAM

-

Healthcare

GDE
8.3%
DRAM

-

Industrials

GDE
7.6%
DRAM

-

Consumer Defensive

GDE
5.5%
DRAM

-

Energy

GDE
3.4%
DRAM

-

Utilities

GDE
2.1%
DRAM

-

Real Estate

GDE
1.6%
DRAM

-

Basic Materials

GDE
1.4%
DRAM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDE vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDE vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDEDRAMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

GDE vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDE vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDE drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDE and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDEDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-19.97%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.53%

-6.74%

-9.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-3.06%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

Volatility

GDE vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDEDRAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.88%

87.02%

-57.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.09%

87.02%

-59.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.09%

87.02%

-59.93%

GDE vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDE vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
4.19%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDE and DRAM have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

GDE is categorized as Gold, while DRAM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GDE and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDE and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer