GCV vs. ANNPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GCV (The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc) and ANNPX (Virtus Convertible Fund) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, GCV returned 10.56%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for ANNPX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCV charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for ANNPX.

Performance

GCV vs. ANNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCV achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly lower than ANNPX's 21.91% return. Over the past 10 years, GCV has underperformed ANNPX with an annualized return of 10.56%, while ANNPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.

GCV

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 5.12%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 6M: 18.60%
• 1Y: 42.59%
• 3Y*: 15.79%
• 5Y*: 4.96%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

ANNPX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 6.09%
• YTD: 21.91%
• 6M: 21.76%
• 1Y: 45.57%
• 3Y*: 21.53%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 14.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCV vs. ANNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCV The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc	16.95%	22.86%	19.93%	-15.58%	-23.95%	19.99%	16.97%	45.72%	-19.03%	37.30%
ANNPX Virtus Convertible Fund	21.91%	22.50%	14.13%	8.39%	-18.65%	4.96%	55.99%	26.45%	2.76%	15.22%

Correlation

The correlation between GCV and ANNPX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 1995	0.29

Over the past year, GCV and ANNPX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

GCV vs. ANNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCV

GCV Risk / Return Rank: 86
GCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
GCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GCV Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
GCV Martin Ratio Rank: 95

ANNPX

ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 93
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCV vs. ANNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCV	ANNPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	3.33	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	4.28	-0.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.58	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.03	6.50	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.01	28.78	-6.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCV vs. ANNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCV Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the ANNPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCV and ANNPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCV	ANNPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	3.33	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.73	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	1.08	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.55	-0.37

Drawdowns

GCV vs. ANNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCV drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, roughly equal to the maximum ANNPX drawdown of -55.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCV and ANNPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCV	ANNPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.67%	-55.61%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.09%	-7.15%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.32%	-13.67%	-11.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.90%	-26.85%	-19.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.90%	-27.36%	-18.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.42%	0.00%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.56%	-17.45%	+4.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	1.61%	+0.33%

Volatility

GCV vs. ANNPX - Volatility Comparison

The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV) and Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) have volatilities of 4.59% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCV	ANNPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	4.58%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.98%	11.25%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.29%	13.97%	+1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.10%	12.84%	+8.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.51%	13.59%	+9.92%

GCV vs. ANNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCV has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than ANNPX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCV vs. ANNPX - Dividend Comparison

GCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than ANNPX's 9.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANNPX Virtus Convertible Fund	9.23%	11.32%	2.31%	2.56%	1.55%	20.74%	6.94%	5.12%	18.79%	23.47%	2.88%	10.63%
GCV The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc	10.17%	11.57%	12.60%	13.33%	10.00%	8.14%	7.68%	8.21%	10.93%	8.14%	8.72%	10.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCV and ANNPX in my portfolio?

GCV and ANNPX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCV or ANNPX?

GCV has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to ANNPX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCV dropped -55.67% vs ANNPX's -55.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.