GCV vs. GUT
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV) and The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT).
GCV is managed by Gabelli Funds. It was launched on Jul 3, 1989. GUT is managed by Gabelli Funds. It was launched on Feb 25, 1999.
Performance
GCV vs. GUT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCV vs. GUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCV The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc | 6.04% | 22.86% | 19.93% | -15.58% | -23.95% | 19.99% | 16.97% | 45.72% | -19.03% | 37.30% |
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust | 2.84% | 33.14% | 6.01% | -21.07% | -1.10% | 9.51% | 13.19% | 42.32% | -7.87% | 22.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCV achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly higher than GUT's 2.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GCV having a 9.54% annualized return and GUT not far behind at 9.48%.
GCV
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
GUT
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- 25.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.63%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCV vs. GUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCV has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than GUT's 0.01% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GCV vs. GUT — Risk / Return Rank
GCV
GUT
GCV vs. GUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV) and The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCV | GUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 1.51 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 2.11 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 3.28 | -1.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 13.85 | -5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCV | GUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.51 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.33 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.40 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.29 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCV and GUT is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GCV vs. GUT - Dividend Comparison
GCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.21%, more than GUT's 9.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCV The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc | 11.21% | 11.57% | 12.60% | 13.33% | 10.00% | 8.14% | 7.68% | 8.21% | 10.93% | 8.14% | 8.72% | 10.04% |
GUT The Gabelli Utility Trust | 9.92% | 9.95% | 11.73% | 11.07% | 7.99% | 7.28% | 7.39% | 7.72% | 10.10% | 8.45% | 9.52% | 10.53% |
Drawdowns
GCV vs. GUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCV drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than GUT's maximum drawdown of -52.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCV and GUT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCV | GUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -52.79% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.47% | -7.65% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.90% | -33.94% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.90% | -42.21% | -3.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.82% | -1.13% | -2.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.63% | -8.05% | -4.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 1.81% | +1.27% |
Volatility
GCV vs. GUT - Volatility Comparison
The Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund Inc (GCV) has a higher volatility of 7.83% compared to The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) at 7.04%. This indicates that GCV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCV | GUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.83% | 7.04% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 11.47% | +1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 16.94% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 21.63% | -0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 23.77% | -0.28% |