GCOR vs. PEP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GCOR (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) is Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Broad Bond Market Index, while PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GCOR returned -0.24%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for PEP. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GCOR vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCOR achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than PEP's 0.20% return.

GCOR

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 0.16%
• 6M: 0.01%
• 1Y: 4.97%
• 3Y*: 3.71%
• 5Y*: -0.24%
• 10Y*: —

PEP

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -7.79%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: -1.92%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: -5.24%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: 6.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCOR vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.16%	7.22%	0.51%	5.79%	-13.83%	-1.88%	0.39%
PEP PepsiCo, Inc.	0.20%	-1.85%	-7.60%	-3.29%	6.78%	20.56%	10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOR and PEP is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020	0.20

The correlation between GCOR and PEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GCOR vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOR

GCOR Risk / Return Rank: 37
GCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
GCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
GCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 35

PEP

PEP Risk / Return Rank: 56
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 51
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCOR vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCOR	PEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	0.58	+0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.02	1.05	+0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.12	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	0.77	+1.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.42	2.12	+3.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCOR vs. PEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOR and PEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCOR	PEP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	0.58	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.04	0.12	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.38	-0.48

Drawdowns

GCOR vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOR drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOR and PEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCOR	PEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.94%	-73.92%	+54.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-16.25%	+13.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.09%	-29.17%	+23.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.63%	-30.32%	+11.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-19.58%	+16.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.99%	-13.64%	+5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	5.87%	-4.95%

Volatility

GCOR vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) is 1.27%, while PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that GCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCOR	PEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.27%	6.35%	-5.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.65%	14.90%	-12.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.65%	21.71%	-18.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.81%	18.38%	-12.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.52%	19.66%	-14.14%

Dividends

GCOR vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

GCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than PEP's 3.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.17%	4.03%	4.36%	3.67%	2.11%	0.92%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PEP PepsiCo, Inc.	3.99%	3.92%	3.51%	2.91%	2.50%	2.45%	2.71%	2.77%	3.25%	2.64%	2.83%	2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCOR and PEP in my portfolio?

GCOR and PEP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCOR or PEP?

PEP has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to GCOR (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOR dropped -18.94% vs PEP's -73.92%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.