GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLX.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L).
GCLX.L and NUCG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCLX.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. It was launched on Mar 1, 2021. NUCG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. It was launched on Feb 3, 2023. Both GCLX.L and NUCG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GCLX.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 13.54% | 32.48% | -25.40% | -23.19% |
NUCG.L VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF | 13.10% | 44.96% | 34.18% | 13.42% |
Different Trading Currencies
GCLX.L is traded in GBp, while NUCG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NUCG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GCLX.L having a 13.54% return and NUCG.L slightly lower at 13.10%.
GCLX.L
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 13.54%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 69.72%
- 3Y*
- -3.28%
- 5Y*
- -8.84%
- 10Y*
- —
NUCG.L
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- -9.02%
- YTD
- 13.10%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- 1Y
- 101.96%
- 3Y*
- 41.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCLX.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NUCG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
GCLX.L
NUCG.L
GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLX.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCLX.L | NUCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.18 | 2.44 | +0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.82 | 3.07 | +0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.51 | 4.13 | +2.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.94 | 10.04 | +10.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCLX.L | NUCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 2.44 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.90 | -1.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCLX.L and NUCG.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GCLX.L nor NUCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCLX.L drawdown since its inception was -69.45%, which is greater than NUCG.L's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCLX.L and NUCG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCLX.L | NUCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.45% | -35.36% | -34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.46% | -26.65% | +14.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.85% | -14.63% | -26.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.60% | -8.99% | -31.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 10.32% | -7.00% |
Volatility
GCLX.L vs. NUCG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLX.L) is 5.76%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that GCLX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCLX.L | NUCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 12.13% | -6.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.51% | 31.04% | -15.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.82% | 41.65% | -19.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 37.59% | -11.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.24% | 37.59% | -11.35% |