GCLE.L vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GCLE.L (Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc) and LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCLE.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, while LIT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GCLE.L returned -4.38%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for LIT. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GCLE.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LIT.

Performance

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCLE.L achieves a 37.25% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 30.84% return.

GCLE.L

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 5.86%
• YTD: 37.25%
• 6M: 40.22%
• 1Y: 90.76%
• 3Y*: 8.37%
• 5Y*: -4.38%
• 10Y*: —

LIT

• 1D: -1.78%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 30.84%
• 6M: 34.89%
• 1Y: 135.24%
• 3Y*: 11.20%
• 5Y*: 4.98%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GCLE.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc	37.25%	41.98%	-26.51%	-10.51%	-30.63%	-22.82%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	30.84%	60.05%	-19.19%	-12.18%	-29.91%	33.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GCLE.L and LIT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2021	0.57

The correlation between GCLE.L and LIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GCLE.L	LIT
Industrials	48.1%	26.0%
Utilities	16.2%	-
Energy	13.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	7.0%
Technology	6.8%	11.5%
Basic Materials	3.4%	55.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.9%	-
Financial Services	0.9%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

GCLE.L vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCLE.L

GCLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
GCLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GCLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
GCLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 91
GCLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GCLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 94
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GCLE.L	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.93	4.16	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.64	4.45	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.59	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.97	10.37	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.97	35.19	-8.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCLE.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.93, which is comparable to the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCLE.L and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GCLE.L	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93	4.16	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	0.16	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.24	0.27	-0.51

Drawdowns

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCLE.L drawdown since its inception was -72.13%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -65.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCLE.L and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCLE.L	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.13%	-65.91%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-13.11%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.23%	-53.01%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.88%	-65.91%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-65.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.38%	-8.53%	-22.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.87%	-33.63%	-11.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	3.86%	-0.51%

Volatility

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc (GCLE.L) has a higher volatility of 9.39% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 8.67%. This indicates that GCLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCLE.L	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.39%	8.67%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.27%	22.00%	-5.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.99%	32.68%	-9.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.50%	31.83%	-3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.04%	30.66%	-1.62%

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCLE.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCLE.L vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

GCLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCLE.L Invesco Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.37%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCLE.L and LIT in my portfolio?

GCLE.L and LIT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GCLE.L or LIT?

On fees, GCLE.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GCLE.L or LIT?

GCLE.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

What is the main difference between GCLE.L and LIT?

GCLE.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while LIT is Commodity Producers Equities. GCLE.L tracks WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, while LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCLE.L and 0.75% for LIT.