GCIIX vs. GLEIX
GCIIX (Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund) and GLEIX (Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - GCIIX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GLEIX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GCIIX returned 12.89%/yr vs 22.95%/yr for GLEIX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCIIX charges 0.80%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for GLEIX.
Performance
GCIIX vs. GLEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCIIX achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly lower than GLEIX's 22.15% return.
GCIIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 14.14%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 33.74%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
GLEIX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 22.15%
- 6M
- 22.06%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- 32.87%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- —
GCIIX vs. GLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund | 14.14% | 40.72% | 9.65% | 20.80% | -14.91% | 11.71% | 7.83% | 18.52% | -15.82% | 2.68% |
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund | 22.15% | 5.30% | 58.18% | 15.08% | 18.96% | 38.31% | -17.46% | 16.95% | -15.17% | 6.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCIIX and GLEIX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017 | 0.49 |
The correlation between GCIIX and GLEIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCIIX vs. GLEIX — Risk / Return Rank
GCIIX
GLEIX
GCIIX vs. GLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCIIX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 3.43 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.54 | 8.09 | +2.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCIIX vs. GLEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCIIX drawdown since its inception was -61.08%, roughly equal to the maximum GLEIX drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCIIX and GLEIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCIIX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.08% | -59.27% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.33% | -7.29% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.25% | -17.07% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.58% | -21.89% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.81% | +5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.02% | -8.52% | -6.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.08% | +0.21% |
Volatility
GCIIX vs. GLEIX - Volatility Comparison
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCIIX | GLEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 5.30% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.40% | 11.29% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 14.73% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 20.58% | -4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 25.42% | -8.64% |
GCIIX vs. GLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCIIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than GLEIX's 1.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCIIX vs. GLEIX - Dividend Comparison
GCIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, less than GLEIX's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCIIX Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund | 6.82% | 7.78% | 9.24% | 2.81% | 3.94% | 6.33% | 1.86% | 2.46% | 1.94% | 1.62% | 2.51% | 1.45% |
GLEIX Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund | 8.18% | 10.00% | 25.43% | 10.22% | 4.70% | 8.41% | 4.17% | 4.83% | 3.54% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCIIX and GLEIX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLEIX has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to GCIIX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCIIX dropped -61.08% vs GLEIX's -59.27%.
GCIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCIIX and GLEIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer