GCGIX vs. GGINX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GCGIX (Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund) and GGINX (Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - GCGIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs, while GGINX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 5 years, GCGIX returned 15.14%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for GGINX. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCGIX charges 0.54%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for GGINX.

Performance

GCGIX vs. GGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCGIX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than GGINX's 10.25% return.

GCGIX

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 25.50%
• 5Y*: 15.14%
• 10Y*: 17.74%

GGINX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -3.21%
• YTD: 10.25%
• 6M: 11.37%
• 1Y: 15.47%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 10.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCGIX vs. GGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund	1.72%	15.51%	53.44%	37.56%	-29.62%	29.10%	32.21%	29.70%	-4.58%	29.75%
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	10.25%	15.18%	28.43%	5.00%	-8.51%	16.49%	-3.81%	31.50%	-8.99%	11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between GCGIX and GGINX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.46

The correlation between GCGIX and GGINX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GCGIX vs. GGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCGIX

GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 16
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

GGINX

GGINX Risk / Return Rank: 36
GGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
GGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
GGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCGIX vs. GGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCGIX	GGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.45	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	2.08	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.25	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	2.81	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.50	7.97	-4.47

GCGIX vs. GGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the GGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCGIX and GGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCGIX vs. GGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCGIX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, which is greater than GGINX's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCGIX and GGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCGIX	GGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.78%	-35.80%	-29.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.25%	-5.59%	-11.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.10%	-15.39%	-9.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.57%	-24.21%	-8.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.49%	-4.14%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.80%	-5.89%	-14.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.35%	1.96%	+3.39%

Volatility

GCGIX vs. GGINX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) at 3.46%. This indicates that GCGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCGIX	GGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.67%	3.46%	+2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.76%	8.80%	+3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.31%	10.83%	+5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.33%	19.72%	+2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	18.97%	+2.63%

GCGIX vs. GGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCGIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than GGINX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCGIX vs. GGINX - Dividend Comparison

GCGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than GGINX's 6.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GCGIX Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund	7.37%	7.50%	23.16%	7.08%	19.27%	42.43%	9.71%	4.02%	10.10%	4.76%	0.76%	0.87%
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	6.08%	6.26%	30.25%	2.67%	0.89%	1.86%	1.75%	2.04%	1.98%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCGIX and GGINX in my portfolio?

GCGIX and GGINX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCGIX or GGINX?

GCGIX has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to GGINX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCGIX dropped -65.78% vs GGINX's -35.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.