GCEQX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GCEQX (Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GCEQX returned 11.47%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for FSPGX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCEQX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

GCEQX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCEQX achieves a 8.06% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 3.18% return.

GCEQX

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 8.06%
• 6M: 6.76%
• 1Y: 24.00%
• 3Y*: 19.22%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: 14.94%

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 22.60%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCEQX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCEQX Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class	8.06%	16.73%	21.72%	27.70%	-23.03%	29.69%	22.23%	30.71%	-4.00%	21.95%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	3.18%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GCEQX and FSPGX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.95

The correlation between GCEQX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCEQX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCEQX

GCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 40
GCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
GCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
GCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCEQX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCEQX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.32	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	1.83	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.23	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	1.32	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.35	4.33	+4.03

GCEQX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCEQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCEQX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCEQX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCEQX drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCEQX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCEQX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.88%	-32.66%	-24.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.27%	-16.17%	+3.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.55%	-23.32%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.33%	-32.66%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.11%	-5.35%	+3.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.54%	-6.36%	-6.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.04%	4.92%	-1.88%

Volatility

GCEQX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) is 5.56%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that GCEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCEQX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.56%	5.94%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	12.61%	-1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.16%	16.21%	-2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.26%	21.61%	-3.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.91%	21.56%	-2.65%

GCEQX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCEQX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCEQX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

GCEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.33%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
GCEQX Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class	4.07%	4.40%	1.10%	0.13%	0.47%	1.11%	1.14%	0.68%	2.24%	0.90%	2.29%	1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCEQX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, GCEQX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GCEQX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to GCEQX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCEQX dropped -56.88% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.