PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCEQX vs. GCBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCEQX vs. GCBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) and Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCEQX achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly higher than GCBLX's 7.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GCEQX has outperformed GCBLX with an annualized return of 14.72%, while GCBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.40% annualized return.


GCEQX

1D
-0.54%
1M
5.76%
YTD
9.79%
6M
10.48%
1Y
26.57%
3Y*
20.48%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
14.72%

GCBLX

1D
0.26%
1M
4.30%
YTD
7.54%
6M
7.18%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
8.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCEQX vs. GCBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCEQX
Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class
9.79%16.73%21.72%27.70%-23.03%29.69%22.23%30.71%-4.00%21.95%
GCBLX
Green Century Balanced Fund
7.54%8.58%9.67%11.78%-16.19%16.43%15.97%20.90%-2.14%12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between GCEQX and GCBLX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 1995

0.82

The correlation between GCEQX and GCBLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.96 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCEQX vs. GCBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCEQX
GCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

GCBLX
GCBLX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
GCBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
GCBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCEQX vs. GCBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) and Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCEQXGCBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.24

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

9.86

-0.67

GCEQX vs. GCBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCEQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the GCBLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCEQX and GCBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCEQXGCBLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.91

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.50

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.73

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.48

+0.02

Drawdowns

GCEQX vs. GCBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCEQX drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, smaller than the maximum GCBLX drawdown of -64.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCEQX and GCBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCEQXGCBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-64.30%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-6.81%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.55%

-13.03%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.33%

-21.88%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

-22.38%

-10.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.56%

-14.56%

+2.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

1.54%

+1.45%

Volatility

GCEQX vs. GCBLX - Volatility Comparison

Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Green Century Balanced Fund (GCBLX) at 2.30%. This indicates that GCEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCEQXGCBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.30%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

6.28%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.42%

7.97%

+5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.14%

11.35%

+6.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

11.59%

+7.26%

GCEQX vs. GCBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCEQX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GCBLX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCEQX vs. GCBLX - Dividend Comparison

GCEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than GCBLX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCBLX
Green Century Balanced Fund
4.52%4.86%7.00%3.02%1.88%3.99%3.61%1.92%2.36%1.29%2.14%2.97%
GCEQX
Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class
4.00%4.40%1.10%0.13%0.47%1.11%1.14%0.68%2.24%0.90%2.29%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCEQX and GCBLX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCEQX has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to GCBLX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCEQX dropped -56.88% vs GCBLX's -64.30%.

GCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCEQX and GCBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer