PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCEQX vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCEQX vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCEQX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, GCEQX has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 14.23%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.


GCEQX

1D
1.43%
1M
0.15%
6M
7.28%
YTD
8.64%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
14.23%
ALL TIME*
9.55%

IEMG

1D
0.64%
1M
-2.17%
6M
8.11%
YTD
17.13%
1Y
33.73%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
8.70%
ALL TIME*
6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$832.99M$964.62M$1.10B

GCEQX vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCEQX
Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class
8.64%16.73%21.72%27.70%-23.03%29.69%22.23%30.71%-4.00%21.95%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
17.13%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GCEQX and IEMG is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.68

The correlation between GCEQX and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCEQX vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCEQX
GCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCEQX vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCEQXIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.46

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

7.50

-2.07

GCEQX vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCEQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCEQX and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCEQX vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCEQX drawdown since its inception was -56.88%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCEQX and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCEQXIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.88%

-38.71%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-13.78%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.55%

-17.21%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.33%

-33.61%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.89%

-38.71%

+5.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-9.17%

+7.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.50%

-12.89%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

4.51%

-1.32%

Volatility

GCEQX vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class (GCEQX) is 4.92%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that GCEQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCEQXIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

8.73%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

21.65%

-9.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.93%

23.74%

-8.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.36%

19.27%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

20.32%

-1.43%

GCEQX vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCEQX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCEQX vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

GCEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than IEMG's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCEQX
Green Century Equity Fund Individual Investor Class
4.01%4.40%1.10%0.13%0.47%1.11%1.14%0.68%2.24%0.90%2.29%1.87%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.30%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCEQX and IEMG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to GCEQX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCEQX dropped -56.88% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCEQX and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer