PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCCIX vs. VCMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCCIX vs. VCMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly lower than VCMDX's 14.30% return.


GCCIX

1D
-0.96%
1M
-6.36%
YTD
11.94%
6M
12.09%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
4.26%

VCMDX

1D
-1.06%
1M
-6.95%
YTD
14.30%
6M
14.43%
1Y
20.85%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCCIX vs. VCMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
11.94%15.45%5.92%-9.65%15.70%33.42%-23.01%3.57%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
14.30%18.20%5.27%-7.45%13.83%34.82%5.07%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and VCMDX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.90

The correlation between GCCIX and VCMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCCIX vs. VCMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCIX
GCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VCMDX
VCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCCIX vs. VCMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCCIXVCMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.01

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

7.26

-1.74

GCCIX vs. VCMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the VCMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and VCMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. VCMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than VCMDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and VCMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCCIXVCMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.80%

-26.67%

-64.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.37%

-10.15%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.89%

-10.15%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.78%

-25.45%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.26%

-10.15%

-62.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.42%

-10.83%

-58.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

2.90%

+0.29%

Volatility

GCCIX vs. VCMDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 3.49%, while Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX) has a volatility of 3.69%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCCIXVCMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

3.69%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

12.85%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

15.02%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

15.83%

+2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

15.38%

+4.60%

GCCIX vs. VCMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VCMDX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCCIX vs. VCMDX - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.37%, more than VCMDX's 13.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
14.37%16.09%4.08%4.20%10.41%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.88%0.84%0.36%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
13.31%15.21%2.19%2.50%14.21%30.56%0.50%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GCCIX and VCMDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCMDX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to GCCIX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCCIX dropped -90.80% vs VCMDX's -26.67%.

VCMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCCIX and VCMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer