PortfoliosLab logo
GCCIX vs. NU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and NU is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GCCIX vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GCCIX:

0.03

NU:

0.05

Sortino Ratio

GCCIX:

0.19

NU:

0.39

Omega Ratio

GCCIX:

1.02

NU:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

GCCIX:

0.01

NU:

0.06

Martin Ratio

GCCIX:

0.17

NU:

0.11

Ulcer Index

GCCIX:

5.62%

NU:

19.73%

Daily Std Dev

GCCIX:

13.03%

NU:

48.27%

Max Drawdown

GCCIX:

-90.66%

NU:

-72.07%

Current Drawdown

GCCIX:

-77.24%

NU:

-24.54%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than NU's 15.73% return.


GCCIX

YTD

4.32%

1M

-0.46%

6M

5.88%

1Y

0.41%

3Y*

-5.08%

5Y*

14.12%

10Y*

-0.51%

NU

YTD

15.73%

1M

-3.38%

6M

-11.38%

1Y

2.39%

3Y*

43.83%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nu Holdings Ltd.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GCCIX vs. NU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCCIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GCCIX is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GCCIX is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GCCIX is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GCCIX is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GCCIX is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GCCIX is 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NU is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NU is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NU is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NU is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NU is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NU is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GCCIX vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the NU Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and NU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GCCIX vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
3.91%4.08%4.20%10.66%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.89%0.84%0.37%0.03%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.66%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and NU.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GCCIX vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 3.64%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...