PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GCCIX vs. AAAU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GCCIX and AAAU is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

GCCIX vs. AAAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%140.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
9.02%
120.78%
GCCIX
AAAU

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GCCIX:

0.28

AAAU:

1.95

Sortino Ratio

GCCIX:

0.47

AAAU:

2.58

Omega Ratio

GCCIX:

1.05

AAAU:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

GCCIX:

0.04

AAAU:

3.56

Martin Ratio

GCCIX:

0.60

AAAU:

10.20

Ulcer Index

GCCIX:

5.34%

AAAU:

2.84%

Daily Std Dev

GCCIX:

11.49%

AAAU:

14.85%

Max Drawdown

GCCIX:

-90.91%

AAAU:

-21.63%

Current Drawdown

GCCIX:

-79.27%

AAAU:

-5.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCCIX achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than AAAU's 26.87% return.


GCCIX

YTD

3.32%

1M

-1.43%

6M

-3.06%

1Y

3.11%

5Y*

2.27%

10Y*

-1.70%

AAAU

YTD

26.87%

1M

-1.03%

6M

12.79%

1Y

28.06%

5Y*

11.97%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GCCIX vs. AAAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCCIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than AAAU's 0.18% expense ratio.


GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
Expense ratio chart for GCCIX: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%
Expense ratio chart for AAAU: current value at 0.18% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.18%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GCCIX vs. AAAU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) and Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GCCIX, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.281.95
The chart of Sortino ratio for GCCIX, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.472.58
The chart of Omega ratio for GCCIX, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.051.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for GCCIX, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0014.000.123.56
The chart of Martin ratio for GCCIX, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.000.6010.20
GCCIX
AAAU

The current GCCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the AAAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCCIX and AAAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.28
1.95
GCCIX
AAAU

Dividends

GCCIX vs. AAAU - Dividend Comparison

GCCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while AAAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GCCIX
Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund
2.26%4.20%10.66%16.46%0.36%10.81%1.47%5.89%0.84%0.37%0.03%
AAAU
Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

GCCIX vs. AAAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCCIX drawdown since its inception was -90.91%, which is greater than AAAU's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCCIX and AAAU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-22.29%
-5.98%
GCCIX
AAAU

Volatility

GCCIX vs. AAAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Commodity Strategy Fund (GCCIX) is 2.48%, while Goldman Sachs Physical Gold ETF (AAAU) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that GCCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.48%
5.15%
GCCIX
AAAU
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab